The Local Coverage Determinations or (LCDs) for CGS Administrators, LLC, which covers our Kansas and Missouri locations, are provided below. For more information, please visit cgsmedicare.com or cms.gov
Medicare coverage of hospice depends on a physician’s certification that an individual’s prognosis is a life expectancy of six months or less if the terminal illness runs its normal course. This policy describes guidelines to be used by Home Health & Hospice (HH&H) MAC in reviewing hospice claims and by hospice providers to determine eligibility of beneficiaries for hospice benefits. Although guidelines applicable to certain disease categories are included, this policy is applicable to all hospice patients. It is intended to be used to identify any Medicare beneficiary whose current clinical status and anticipated progression of disease is more likely than not to result in a life expectancy of six months or less.
Clinical variables with general applicability without regard to diagnosis, as well as clinical variables applicable to a limited number of specific diagnoses, are provided. Patients who meet the guidelines established herein are expected to have a life expectancy of six months or less if the terminal illness runs its normal course. Some patients may not meet these guidelines, yet still have a life expectancy of 6 months or less. Coverage for these patients may be approved if documentation of clinical factors supporting a less than 6-month life expectancy not included in these guidelines is provided.
If a patient improves or stabilizes sufficiently over time while in hospice such that he/she no longer has a prognosis of six months or less from the most recent recertification evaluation or definitive interim evaluation, that patient should be considered for discharge from the Medicare hospice benefit. Such patients can be re-enrolled for a new benefit period when a decline in their clinical status is such that their life expectancy is again six months or less. On the other hand, patients in the terminal stage of their illness who originally qualify for the Medicare hospice benefit but stabilize or improve while receiving hospice care, yet have a reasonable expectation of continued decline for a life expectancy of less than six months, remain eligible for hospice care.
A patient will be considered to have a life expectancy of six months or less if he/she meets the non-disease specific decline in clinical status guidelines described in Part I. Alternatively, the baseline non-disease specific guidelines described in Part II plus the applicable disease specific guidelines listed in the appendix will establish the necessary expectancy.
Patients will be considered to have a life expectancy of six months or less if there is documented evidence of decline in clinical status based on the guidelines listed below. Since determination of decline presumes assessment of the patient’s status over time, it is essential that both baseline and follow-up determinations be reported where appropriate. Baseline data may be established on admission to hospice or by using existing information from records. Other clinical variables not on this list may support a six-month or less life expectancy. These should be documented in the clinical record.
These changes in clinical variables apply to patients whose decline is not considered to be reversible. They are listed in order of their likelihood to predict poor survival, the most predictive first and the least predictive last. No specific number of variables must be met, but fewer of those listed first (more predictive) and more of those listed last (least predictive) would be expected to predict longevity of six months or less.
(both of these should be met)
See appendix for disease specific guidelines to be used with these (Part II) baseline guidelines. The baseline guidelines do not independently qualify a patient for hospice coverage.
Note: The word “should” in the disease specific guidelines means that on medical review the guideline so identified will be given great weight in making a coverage determination. It does not mean, however, that meeting the guideline is obligatory.
Although not the primary hospice diagnosis, the presence of disease such as the following, the severity of which is likely to contribute to a life expectancy of six months or less, should be considered in determining hospice eligibility.
Medical review of records of hospice patients that do not document that patients meet the guidelines set forth herein may result in denial of coverage unless other clinical circumstances reasonably predictive of a life expectancy of six months or less are provided.
The condition of some patients receiving hospice care may stabilize or improve during or due to that care, with the expectation that the stabilization or improvement will not be brief and temporary. In such circumstances, if the patient’s condition changes such that he or she no longer has a prognosis of life expectancy of six months or less, and that improvement can be expected to continue outside the hospice setting, then that patient should be discharged from hospice.
On the other hand, patients in the terminal stage of their illness who originally qualify for the Medicare hospice benefit but stabilize or improve while receiving hospice care, yet have a reasonable expectation of continued decline for a life expectancy of less than six months, remain eligible for hospice care.
Documentation certifying terminal status must contain enough information to support terminal status upon review. Documentation of the applicable criteria listed under the “Indications” section of this policy would meet this requirement. If other clinical indicators of decline not listed in this policy such as psychological and spiritual factors form the basis for certifying terminal status, they should be documented as well. Recertification for hospice care requires the same clinical standards be met as for initial certification, but they need not be reiterated. They may be incorporated by specific reference as part (or all) of the indication for recertification. Note, however, paragraph 3 of 'General Indications' under "Indications and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical Necessity" regarding patients who improve or stabilize.
Documentation should “paint a picture” for the reviewer to clearly see why the patient is appropriate for hospice care and the level of care provided, i.e., routine home, continuous home, inpatient respite, or general inpatient. The records should include observations and data, not merely conclusions. However, documentation expectations should comport with normal clinical documentation practices. Unless elements in the record require explanation, such as a non-morbid diagnosis or indicators of likely greater than 6-month survival, as stated below, no extra or additional record entries should be needed to show hospice benefit eligibility.
The amount and detail of documentation will differ in different situations. Thus a patient with metastatic small cell CA may be demonstrated to be hospice eligible with less documentation than a chronic lung disease patient. These situations are obvious. Patients with chronic lung disease, long term survival in hospice, or apparent stability can still be eligible for hospice benefits, but sufficient justification for a less than six month prognosis should appear in the record.
If the documentation includes any findings inconsistent with or tending to disprove a less than 6-month prognosis, they should be answered or refuted by other entries, or specifically addressed and explained. Most facts and observations tending to suggest a greater than 6 month prognosis are predictable and apparent, such as a prolonged stay in hospice or a low immediate mortality diagnosis, as stated above. But specific entries can also call for an answer, such as an opinion by one team member or recovery of ADLS when they were part of the basis for the initial declaration of eligibility. Also the lack of certain documentation elements such as a tissue diagnosis for cancer will not create non-eligibility for the hospice benefit, but does necessitate other supportive documentation.
Documentation submitted may include information from periods of time that fall outside the billing period currently under review. Include supporting events such as a change in the level of activities of daily living, recent hospitalizations, and the known date of death (if you are billing for a period of time prior to the billing period in which death occurred.)
Documentation should support the level of care being provided to the patient during the time period under review, i.e. routine or continuous home or inpatient, respite, or general. The reviewer should be able to easily identify the dates and times of changes in levels of care and the reason for the change.
In addition the documentation must comply with the requirements found in accordance with CMS IOM 100-02 Chapter 9 Section 20.
Note: These guidelines are to be use
d in conjunction with the “Non-disease specific baseline guidelines” described in Part II of the basic policy.
Note: Certain cancers with poor prognoses (e.g. small cell lung cancer, brain cancer and pancreatic cancer) may be hospice eligible without fulfilling the other criteria in this section.
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of ALS (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria. (Should fulfill 1, 2, or 3).
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of dementia (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria. Patients with dementia should show all the following characteristics:
Patients should have had one of the following within the past 12 months:
Note: This section is specific for Alzheimer’s Disease and related disorders, and is not appropriate for other types of dementia, such as multi-infarct dementia.
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of heart disease (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria. (1 and 2 should be present. Factors from 3 will add supporting documentation.):
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of their illness (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria. (1 and 2 should be present; factors from 3 will add supporting documentation):
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of liver disease (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria. (1 and 2 should be present; factors from 3 will lend supporting documentation.):
Patients awaiting liver transplant who otherwise fit the above criteria may be certified for the Medicare hospice benefit, but if a donor organ is procured, the patient should be discharged from hospice.
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of pulmonary disease (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria. The criteria refer to patients with various forms of advanced pulmonary disease who eventually follow a final common pathway for end stage pulmonary disease. (1 and 2 should be present. Documentation of 3, 4, and 5, will lend supporting documentation.):
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of renal disease (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria.
(1 and either 2 or 3 should be present. Factors from 4 will lend supporting documentation.)
(1 and either 2 or 3 should be present. Factors from 4 will lend supporting documentation.)
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of stroke or coma (life expectancy of six months or less) if they meet the following criteria.
Comatose patients with any 3 of the following on day three of coma:
Documentation of the following factors will support eligibility for hospice care: Documentation of medical complications, in the context of progressive clinical decline, within the previous 12 months, which support a terminal prognosis:
Documentation of diagnostic imaging factors which support poor prognosis after stroke include:
The Local Coverage Determinations or (LCDs) for Palmetto GBA, which covers our Oklahoma and Texas locations, are provided below. For more information, please visit palmettogba.com or cms.gov
Medicare coverage of hospice care depends upon a physician’s certification of an individual’s prognosis of a life expectancy of six months or less if the terminal illness runs its normal course. Recognizing that determination of life expectancy during the course of a terminal illness is difficult, this A/B Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC)(HHH) has established medical criteria for determining prognosis for non-cancer diagnoses. These criteria form a reasonable approach to the determination of life expectancy based on available research, and may be revised as more research is available. Coverage of hospice care for patients not meeting the criteria in this policy may be denied. However, some patients may not meet the criteria, yet still be appropriate for hospice care because of other comorbidities or rapid decline. Coverage for these patients may be approved on an individual consideration basis.
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of liver disease (life expectancy of 6 months or less) if they meet the following criteria (1 and 2 must be present; factors from 3 will lend supporting documentation):
Patients awaiting liver transplant who otherwise fit the above criteria may be certified for the Medicare hospice benefit, but if a donor organ is procured, the patient must be discharged from hospice.
Medicare coverage of hospice care depends upon a physician's certification of an individual's prognosis of a life expectancy of 6 months or less, if the terminal illness runs its normal course. Recognizing that determination of life expectancy during the course of a terminal illness is difficult, this Medicare Administrative Contractor has established medical criteria for determining prognosis for non-cancer diagnoses. These criteria form a reasonable approach to the determination of life expectancy based on available research and may be revised as more research is available. Coverage of hospice care for patients not meeting the criteria in this policy may be denied. However, some patients may not meet the criteria yet still be appropriate for hospice care because of other comorbidities or rapid decline. Coverage for these patients may be approved on an individual consideration basis.
Patients will be considered to be in the terminal stage of their illness (life expectancy of 6 months or less) if they meet the following criteria:
Neurological conditions are associated with impairments, activity limitations, and disability. Their impact on any given individual depends on the individual’s over-all health status. Health status includes environmental factors, such as the availability of palliative care services. The objective of this policy is to present a framework for identifying, documenting, and communicating the unique health care needs of individuals with neurological conditions and thus promote the over-all goal of the right care for every person, every time.
Neurological conditions may support a prognosis of six months or less under many clinical scenarios. Medicare rules and regulations addressing hospice services require the documentation of sufficient clinical information and other documentation to support the certification of individuals as having a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six or fewer months, if the illness runs its normal course. The identification of specific structural/functional impairments, together with any relevant activity limitations, should serve as the basis for palliative interventions and care-planning. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to help identify and document the unique service needs of individuals with neurological conditions is suggested, but not required.
The health status changes associated with neurological conditions can be characterized using categories contained in the ICF. The ICF contains domains and categories (e.g., structures of the nervous system, mental functions, sensory functions and pain, neuromusculoskeletal and movement related functions, communication, mobility, and self-care) that allow for a comprehensive description of an individual’s health status and service needs. Information addressing relevant ICF categories, defined within each of these domains and categories, should form the core of the clinical record and be incorporated into the care plan, as appropriate.
Additionally, the care plan may be impacted by relevant secondary and/or comorbid conditions. Secondary conditions are directly related to a primary condition. In the case of neurological conditions, examples of secondary conditions could include dysphagia, pneumonia, and pressure ulcers. Comorbid conditions affecting beneficiaries with neurological conditions are, by definition, distinct from the primary condition itself, however, services aimed at the comorbid condition may indeed be related to the palliation and/or management of the terminal condition. An example of a comorbid condition would be Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
The important roles of secondary and comorbid conditions are described below in order to facilitate their recognition and assist providers in documenting their impact. The identification and documentation of relevant secondary and comorbid conditions, together with the identification and description of associated structural/functional impairments, activity limitations, and environmental factors would help establish hospice eligibility and maintain a beneficiary-centered plan of care.
Neurological conditions may be complicated by secondary conditions. The significance of a given secondary condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments - together with any limitation in activity and restriction in participation - related to the secondary condition. The occurrence of secondary conditions in beneficiaries with neurological conditions results from the presence of impairments in such body functions as consciousness, attention, sequencing complex movements, ingestion (which includes chewing, manipulation of food in the mouth, and swallowing), muscle power, tone, and endurance. These impairments contribute to the increased incidence of secondary conditions such as dysphagia, pneumonia, and pressure ulcers observed in Medicare beneficiaries with neurological conditions. Secondary conditions themselves may be associated with a new set of structural/functional impairments that may or may not respond or be amenable to treatment.
Ultimately, in order to support a hospice plan of care, the combined effects of the primary neurological condition and any identified secondary condition(s) should be such that most beneficiaries with the identified impairments would have a prognosis of six months or less.
The significance of a given comorbid condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments - together with any limitation in activity and restriction in participation - related to the comorbid condition. For example, a beneficiary with a primary neurological condition such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and a comorbidity of COPD could have specific COPD-related structural and functional impairments of respiration (e.g., structural impairments of the bronchoalveolar tree resulting in increased respiratory rate, cough and impaired gas exchange) that contribute to the activity limitations and participation restrictions already present due to the respiratory muscle weakness often observed with ALS.
Such a combination could affect the palliative care plan by contributing to the individual’s dyspnea and impaired exercise tolerance. Further description/documentation using the activities and participation component of the ICF (e.g., mobility, self-care, and interpersonal interactions and relationships), would help complete the clinical picture. Palliative care aimed at relieving the dyspnea and improving the individual’s health status would be the goal.
Ultimately, in order to support a hospice plan of care, the combined effects of the primary neurologic condition and any identified comorbid condition(s) should be such that most beneficiaries with the identified impairments would have a prognosis of six months or less. The documentation of structural/functional impairments, together with the observed activity limitations, facilitate the selection of the most appropriate intervention strategies (palliative/hospice vs. long-term disease management) and provide objective criteria for determining the effects of such interventions. The documentation of these variables is thus essential in the determination of reasonable and necessary Medicare Hospice Services.
End stage renal disease (ESRD) may support a prognosis of six months or less under many clinical scenarios. The identification of specific structural/functional impairments, together with any relevant activity limitations, should serve as the basis for palliative interventions and care planning. The structural and functional impairments associated with a primary diagnosis of ESRD are often complicated by comorbid and/or secondary conditions. Comorbid conditions affecting beneficiaries with ESRD are by definition distinct from the ESRD itself- examples include vascular disease manifested as coronary heart disease (CHD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and vascular dementia. Secondary conditions, on the other hand, are directly related to a primary condition. In the case of ESRD, examples include secondary hyperparathyroidism, calciphylaxis, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, electrolyte abnormalities and anorexia. The important roles of comorbid and secondary conditions are described below in order to facilitate their recognition and assist providers in documenting their impact. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is suggested, but not required.
Medicare rules and regulations require the documentation of sufficient “clinical information and other documentation” to support the certification of individuals as having a terminal illness with a life expectancy of 6 or fewer months, if the illness runs its normal course. For beneficiaries with ESRD the identification of relevant comorbid and secondary conditions, together with the identification and description of associated structural/functional impairments, activity limitations, and environmental factors would help establish hospice eligibility and maintain a beneficiary-centered plan of care.
ESRD may be complicated by secondary conditions. The significance of a given secondary condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments - together with any limitation in activity - related to the secondary condition. The occurrence of secondary conditions in beneficiaries with ESRD is facilitated by the presence of impairments in such body functions as urinary excretory function, water, mineral and electrolyte function, and endocrine gland functions. Such functional impairments contribute to the increased incidence of secondary conditions such as hyperkalemia, fluid overload, and secondary hyperparathyroidism observed in Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD. Secondary conditions themselves may be associated with a new set of structural/functional impairments that may or may not respond/be amenable to treatment. Ultimately, the combined effects of the ESRD and any secondary condition should be such that most beneficiaries with ESRD and similar impairments would have a prognosis of six months or less.
The significance of a given comorbid condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments - together with any limitation in activity - related to the comorbid condition. For example, a beneficiary with ESRD and clinically significant CHD would have specific impairments of cardiovascular structure/function (e.g., narrowing of coronary arteries, dyspnea, orthopnea, chest pain) which may or may not respond/be amenable to treatment. The identified impairments in cardiovascular structure/function may be associated with activity limitations (e.g., mobility, self-care). Ultimately, the combined effects of the ESRD and any comorbid condition should be such that most beneficiaries with ESRD and similar impairments would have a prognosis of six months or less.
The documentation of structural/functional impairments and activity limitations facilitates the selection of intervention strategies (palliative vs. long-term disease management/curative) and provides objective criteria for determining the effects of such interventions. The documentation of these variables is thus essential in the determination of reasonable and necessary Medicare hospice services.
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and related disorders may support a prognosis of 6 months or less under many clinical scenarios. The identification of specific structural/functional impairments, together with any relevant activity limitations, should serve as the basis for palliative interventions and care planning. The structural and functional impairments associated with a primary diagnosis of AD are often complicated by comorbid and/or secondary conditions. Comorbid conditions affecting beneficiaries with AD are by definition distinct from the AD itself. Examples include coronary heart disease (CHD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Secondary conditions, on the other hand, are directly related to a primary condition. In the case of AD examples include delirium and pressure ulcers. The important roles of comorbid and secondary conditions are described below in order to facilitate their recognition and assist providers in documenting their impact.
The Reisberg Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) scale has been used for many years to describe Medicare beneficiaries with AD and a prognosis of 6 months or less. The FAST scale is a 16-item scale designed to parallel the progressive activity limitations associated with AD. Stage 7 identifies the threshold of activity limitation that would support a 6 month prognosis. The FAST scale does not address the impact of comorbid and secondary conditions. These 2 variables are thus considered separately by this policy.
Stage #1: No difficulty, either subjectively or objectively
Stage #2: Complains of forgetting location of objects; subjective work difficulties
Stage #3: Decreased job functioning evident to coworkers; difficulty in traveling to new locations
Stage #4: Decreased ability to perform complex tasks (e.g., planning dinner for guests; handling finances)
Stage #5: Requires assistance in choosing proper clothing
Stage #6: Decreased ability to dress, bathe, and toilet independently:
Stage #7: Loss of speech, locomotion, and consciousness:
The significance of a given comorbid condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments, together with any limitation in activity, related to the comorbid condition. For example a beneficiary with AD and clinically significant CHD or COPD would have specific impairments of cardiorespiratory function (e.g., dyspnea, orthopnea, wheezing, chest pain), which may or may not respond or be amenable to treatment. The identified impairments in cardiorespiratory function would be associated with both specific structural impairments of the coronary arteries or bronchial tree, and may be associated with activity limitations (e.g., mobility, self-care). Ultimately, the combined effects of the AD (FAST stage 7 or beyond) and any comorbid condition should be such that most beneficiaries with AD (FAST stage 7 or beyond) and similar impairments would have a prognosis of 6 months or less.
AD may be complicated by secondary conditions. The significance of a given secondary condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments, together with any limitation in activity, related to the secondary condition. The occurrence of secondary conditions in beneficiaries with AD is facilitated by the presence of impairments in such body functions as mental functioning and movement functions. Such functional impairments contribute to the increased incidence of secondary conditions, such as delirium and pressure ulcers, observed in Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s Disease. Secondary conditions themselves may be associated with a new set of structural/functional impairments that may or may not respond or be amenable to treatment. Ultimately, the combined effects of the AD (FAST stage 7 and beyond) and any secondary condition should be such that most beneficiaries with AD and similar impairments would have a prognosis of months or less.
The documentation of structural/functional impairments and activity limitations facilitate the selection of intervention strategies (palliative vs. curative) and provide objective criteria for determining the effects of such interventions. The documentation of these variables is thus essential in the determination of reasonable and necessary Medicare Hospice Services.
For beneficiaries with AD to be eligible for hospice the individual should have a FAST level of greater than or equal to 7 and specific comorbid or secondary conditions meeting the above criteria.
Cardiopulmonary conditions are associated with impairments, activity limitations, and disability. Their impact on any given individual depends on the individual’s overall health status. Health status includes measures of functioning, physical illness, and mental well-being, as well as, environmental factors, such as the availability of palliative care services. The objective of this policy is to present a framework for identifying, documenting, and communicating the unique health care needs of individuals with cardiopulmonary conditions, and thus promote the overall goal of the appropriate care for every person, every time.
Cardiopulmonary conditions may support a prognosis of 6 months or less under many clinical scenarios. Medicare rules and regulations addressing hospice services require the documentation of sufficient “clinical information and other documentation” to support the certification of individuals as having a terminal illness with a life expectancy of 6 or fewer months, if the illness runs its normal course. The identification of specific structural/functional impairments, together with any relevant activity limitations, should serve as the basis for palliative interventions and care planning. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to help identify and document the unique service needs of individuals with cardiopulmonary conditions is suggested, but not required.
The health status changes associated with cardiopulmonary conditions can be characterized using categories contained in the ICF. The ICF contains domains (e.g., structures of cardiovascular and respiratory systems, functions of the cardiovascular and respiratory system, communication, mobility, and self-care) that allow for a comprehensive description of an individual’s health status and service needs. Information addressing relevant ICF categories, defined within each of these domains, should form the core of the clinical record and be incorporated into the care plan, as appropriate.
Additionally, the care plan may be impacted by relevant secondary and/or comorbid conditions. Secondary conditions are directly related to a primary condition. In the case of cardiopulmonary conditions, examples of secondary conditions could include delirium, pneumonia, stasis ulcers, and pressure ulcers. Comorbid conditions affecting beneficiaries with cardiopulmonary conditions are, by definition, distinct from the primary condition itself. An example of a comorbid condition would be End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).
The important roles of secondary and comorbid conditions are described below, in order to facilitate their recognition and assist providers in documenting their impact. The identification and documentation of relevant secondary and comorbid conditions, together with the identification and description of associated structural/functional impairments, activity limitations, and environmental factors would help establish hospice eligibility and maintain a beneficiary-centered plan of care.
Cardiopulmonary conditions may be complicated by secondary conditions. The significance of a given secondary condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments together with any limitation in activity and restriction in participation related to the secondary condition. The occurrence of secondary conditions in beneficiaries with cardiopulmonary conditions results from the presence of impairments in such body functions as heart/respiratory rate and rhythm, contraction force of ventricular muscles, blood supply to the heart, sleep functions, and depth of respiration. These impairments contribute to the increased incidence of secondary conditions, such as delirium, pneumonia, stasis ulcers, and pressure ulcers observed in Medicare beneficiaries with cardiopulmonary conditions. Secondary conditions, themselves, may be associated with a new set of structural/functional impairments that may or may not respond/be amenable to treatment.
Ultimately, in order to support a hospice plan of care, the combined effects of the primary cardiopulmonary condition and any identified secondary condition(s) should be such that most beneficiaries with the identified impairments would have a prognosis of 6 months or less.
The significance of a given comorbid condition is best described by defining the structural/functional impairments together with any limitation in activity and restriction in participation related to the comorbid condition. For example, a beneficiary with a primary cardiopulmonary condition and ESRD could have specific ESRD-related impairments of water, mineral and electrolyte balance functions coexisting with the cardiopulmonary impairments associated with the primary cardiopulmonary condition (e.g., Aortic Stenosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or Heart Failure).
Ultimately, in order to support a hospice plan of care, the combined effects of the primary cardiopulmonary condition and any identified comorbid condition(s), should be such that most beneficiaries with the identified impairments would have a prognosis of 6 months or less.
The documentation of structural/functional impairments and activity limitations facilitate the selection of the most appropriate intervention strategies (palliative/hospice versus long-term disease management), and provide objective criteria for determining the effects of such interventions. The documentation of these variables is thus essential in the determination of reasonable and necessary Medicare hospice services.
Good Shepherd Hospice does not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in admission, treatment, or participation in its programs, services and activities or in employment.
© 2020 Copyright Good Shepherd Hospice. All Rights Reserved.